Monday, March 25, 2019

Comparing Science and the Judicial System :: Biology Essays Research Papers

Comparing knowledge and the Judicial System Science and the Judicial System are two concepts that at face determine seem to be very distinct and unique in their avouch nature, but their cores share interesting parallels. They each propose a distinct way of understanding how we comprehend and organize order and structure inside institutions, yet they do so with same strategies. In this paper Ill character my understanding of both, what characteristics they share and how these similarities prove them to be inextricably connected by what we call life and its connection to the humans experience. Although Science is for the most part still of observation, experiments and their results, it is often controversial because perspective and experience play a tell apart role in how data is interpreted. And because perspective and experience undoubtedly alter with each person due to various reasons how is it possible that we can pin down concrete truths to such a varied conceptualizat ion? Scientists fuse logical dodging and philosophy. Traditional science often fails to provide theories and explanations for phenomenons that hold truth and organisation in both a scientific context and the context of the human approximation. I feel that Science often caters to only a dismal and white way of formulating answers failing to recognize the gray areas. Often times people try to find the most common and accepted shipway to support their theories and in doing so they adapt to the standard and more tralatitious ways of viewing the land. This leaves less room for creativity and exploration of the mind when trying to formulate truth. A body of assertions is true if it forms a coherent whole and works both in the external world and in our minds. Roger Newton (1) Much like science, the justice system in this country is very much based on experience. Although the understanding of these laws is largely composed of formal education, logic and reasoning, there is more to l aw consequently these solid and concrete aspects. Experience plays a key role because before obtaining any form of judicial authority one must coif and get a feel for what the position entails. Through these experiences one acquires a very personal and first hand knowledge and experience that is obligatory before venturing out into his or her field. The judicial system poses a similar problem to that of traditional science. I believe the laws in our justice system are far too clear cut.

No comments:

Post a Comment