Thursday, September 26, 2013

The glass menagerie 2

Happiness vs. Responsibility         The Glass Menagerie, written by Tennessee Williams brings frontwards the hesitancy as to whether one has the right to be halcyon by giving up principal(prenominal) responsibilities. gobbler Wingfield is a example in the play that must face this moral dilemma. He is macrocosm driven crazy by his draws constant fate and dissatisfaction with his every action. nonetheless, he feels it is his duty to provide for his develop and sis, darn at the same time is giving up his aspirations and dreams. His mother does not appreciate what he sacrifices for them. In fact she frequently tells him that he is self-centered. gobbler is very unsatisfied with his breeding as a factory worker and starts thinking about fade home and abandoning his family in return for the pursuit of merriment.         Happiness is a very pregnant aspect to life. It could be said that cheer is what makes life worth living. Re sponsibility to others is also very meaning(a) because it is what makes humans open to coexist. If no one took right for others than children would not have caring parents, people could not trust independently other, and love could not exist. Analytically speaking, right to others is much meaning(a) to the function of society as a whole than soulal joy. However to a single person, happiness generally seems to be more important than responsibility. An unhappy person that spends their entire life being burdened by the responsibility of another person qualification as well be a slave. In the persona of Tom Wingfield, leaving his familys home in lookup of happiness was an appropriate and understandable action. This is because his mother was so phantasmagorical in her expectations of him as well as extremely slender that it was suicidal for him to stay in such an environment for either longer.

His sister Laura was around twenty-four years old and should be able to take care of herself and Amanda, the mother, having only herself to look later on should be fine as well. In the play Tom compares himself with his father who walked out on his family. This however, is not a comely analogy. Someone who is in their early twenties without a married woman or kids should not have the same amount of responsibility as that of an older man who decided to have a family. It is completely unfair to expect Tom to give up all of his desires to support his family members, both of whom are younger than him and physically able to support themselves. Tom had to make a disfranchised decision, but the fight at the end of the play exacerbated th e suffer relationship Tom had with his mother Amanda. This fight understandably was the far straw for Tom, and it was at this point that he parted shipway with his family to seek and new and more satisfying life. If you want to take a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment